Good Papers

Showing papers from CMU, Carnegie Mellon University Show all papers

57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

Are we really tilting? The mechanics of reward guidance in flow and diffusion models

Sanjit Dandapanthula, Nicholas Boffi

Sydney Poster Session 2, Tue, Dec 8, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Implicit Goal Conditioning via Value Disaggregation

Shashwat Saxena, Mehul Goel, Sreyas Venkataraman, Sarvesh Patil and 1 more

Sydney Poster Session 2, Tue, Dec 8, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

Identifiable Feedback-Controlled Latent Flow for Unpaired Single-cell Spatio-Temporal Dynamics

Jianle Sun, Kun Zhang

Sydney Poster Session 2, Tue, Dec 8, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

MM-SCALE: Evaluating Evidence-Grounded Moral Judgment in Vision-Language Models

Eunkyu Park, Wesley Deng, Cheyon Jin, Matheus Kunzler Maldaner and 7 more

Sydney Poster Session 6, Thu, Dec 10, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

ANCHOR: Audio-Visually Grounded Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Benchmark

Joel Julin, Souraja Kundu, Liza Dahiya, George Z Wei and 5 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Learning Hierarchical Patch Splitting Policies for Faster Vision Transformers

Aditya Gupta, Jean S Dandurand, Kai Qiu, Rohan Choudhury and 1 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

ML-assisted Randomization Tests for A/B Experiments

Wenxuan Guo, JungHo Lee, Panos Toulis

Atlanta Poster Session 4, Thu, Dec 10, 4:30 PM–7:30 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Beyond Eigenfunctions: Divergence Principal Functions for Representation Learning

Ritabrata Ray, Sahil Dharod, Burak Varıcı, Nicholas Boffi and 1 more

Sydney Poster Session 4, Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

GPU Hierarchy Meets Structured Matrices: Fast Algorithms for State-Space Models

Berlin Chen, Caitlin Wang, Aakash Sunil Lahoti, Kevin Li and 7 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

ImmuVis: Hyperconvolutional Foundation Models for Imaging Mass Cytometry

Dawid Uchal, Marcin Możejko, Krzysztof Gogolewski, Piotr Kupidura and 13 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Trajectory Planning without Trajectory Data: A Manifold-Guided Approach

Silong Yong, Anji Liu, Cunxi Dai, Carl Busart and 4 more

Atlanta Poster Session 4, Thu, Dec 10, 4:30 PM–7:30 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

Vortex: Efficient and Programmable Sparse Attention Serving

Zhuoming Chen, Xinrui Zhong, Qilong Feng, Ranajoy Sadhukhan and 4 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

The Unembedding Bottleneck: A Mechanistic Analysis of Single Digit Counting in LLMs

Satwik Sunnam, Raghav Magazine, Vatsalya Singh, Lavanya Kotha and 2 more

Atlanta Poster Session 5, Fri, Dec 11, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 1/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

DUIL: Deep Unsupervised Inverse Learning for in situ Macromolecular Morphology Identification

Mostofa Rafid Uddin, Seonghui Min, Mahek Vora, Qifeng Wu and 2 more

Atlanta Poster Session 2, Wed, Dec 9, 4:30 PM–7:30 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

Can Agents Price a Reaction? Evaluating LLMs on Chemical Cost Reasoning

Yuyang Wu, Yue Huang, Shuaike Shen, Xujian Wang and 7 more

Sydney Poster Session 5, Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
72%Highly rated
?Highly ratedVote to see the score

Test-time Scaling of Diffusions with Flow Maps

Flow Map Trajectory Tilting uses flow maps to enable principled diffusion test-time scaling with reward gradients, improving reward ascent and enabling complex image editing via vision-language models.

Amirmojtaba Sabour, Michael Albergo, Carles Domingo i Enrich, Nicholas Boffi and 3 more

Sydney Poster Session 1, Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026 · ▲ 6 on Hugging Face

– ReadersNo votes yet
8/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 8 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 3/5
medium 5/10
strict 0/5
86%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score

MolmoMotion: Forecasting Point Trajectories in 3D with Language Instruction

MolmoMotion predicts goal-conditioned 3D point trajectories from visual history and language, outperforming baselines on PointMotionBench and improving robot manipulation and video synthesis.

Jianing Zhang, Chenhao Zheng, Yajun Yang, Rustin Soraki and 6 more

Atlanta Poster Session 5, Fri, Dec 11, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026 · ▲ 53 on Hugging Face · Code ★ 151

– ReadersNo votes yet
14/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 14 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 7/10
strict 2/5
91%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score

Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoising

Continuous flow language models outperform discrete diffusion in quality and speed, and distilling their unique flow map enables one-step generation surpassing eight-step discrete diffusion.

Chanhyuk Lee, Jaehoon Yoo, Manan Agarwal, Sheel Shah and 5 more

Sydney Poster Session 4, Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026 · ▲ 4 on Hugging Face · Code ★ 172

– ReadersNo votes yet
17/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 17 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 10/10
strict 2/5
72%Highly rated
?Highly ratedVote to see the score

Measuring Weak-to-Strong Legibility of Reasoning Models

This paper defines weak-to-strong legibility for reasoning models and argues existing efficiency metrics miss thoroughness needed for weak monitors.

Dani Roytburg, Shreya Sridhar, Daphne Ippolito

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
8/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 8 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 3/10
strict 0/5
91%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score

PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluation

PACE predicts agentic benchmark scores from small, selected non-agentic test subsets via regression, achieving under 4% error and over 0.80 correlation at under 1% evaluation cost.

Yueqi Song, Lintang Sutawika, Jiarui Liu, Lindia Tjuatja and 7 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026 · ▲ 18 on Hugging Face

– ReadersNo votes yet
18/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 18 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 9/10
strict 4/5
Show 20 more papers