Good Papers

Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance

Watermarking lacks enforceable standards and audit infrastructure, so current implementations serve as symbolic compliance rather than effective AI oversight.

Alexander Nemecek, Yuzhou Jiang, Erman Ayday

Published 2026Atlanta Poster Session 4 · Thu, Dec 10, 4:30 PM–7:30 PM local time · Hall C1arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

72%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel8/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 3/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Watermarking has emerged as a leading technical proposal for attributing generative AI content and is increasingly cited in global governance frameworks. This position paper argues that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight. We identify a growing gap between regulatory expectations and the technical limitations of existing watermarking schemes. Through analysis of policy proposals and industry practices, we show how incentive structures disincentivize robust, auditable deployments. To realign watermarking with governance goals, we propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms. Without enforceable requirements and independent verification, watermarking will remain inadequate for accountability and ultimately undermine broader efforts in AI safety and regulation.