Good Papers

Showing papers from NTU Singapore Show all papers

45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Auto-Rubric as Reward: From Implicit Preference to Explicit Generative Criteria

Juanxi Tian, Fengyuan Liu, Jiaming Han, Yilei Jiang and 5 more

Sydney Poster Session 4, Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
88%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score

PhyMotion: Structured 3D Motion Reward for Physics-Grounded Human Video Generation

PhyMotion evaluates human video motion via physics-simulated 3D trajectory rewards across kinematics, contact, and dynamics, improving RL post-training realism by +68 Elo.

Yidong Huang, Zun Wang, Han Lin, Dong-Ki Kim and 5 more

Atlanta Poster Session 5, Fri, Dec 11, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026 · ▲ 6 on Hugging Face · Code ★ 49

– ReadersNo votes yet
15/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 15 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 8/10
strict 3/5
89%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score

When and How Much to Imagine: Adaptive Test-Time Scaling with World Models for Visual Spatial Reasoning

AVIC adaptively scales test-time visual imagination via world models for spatial reasoning, matching fixed strategies with fewer calls while exceeding GPT-4o.

Shoubin Yu, Yue Zhang, Zun Wang, Jaehong Yoon and 3 more

Atlanta Poster Session 3, Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026 · ▲ 9 on Hugging Face · Code ★ 20

– ReadersNo votes yet
16/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 16 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 10/10
strict 1/5