Good Papers

Visual-ERM: Reward Modeling for Visual Equivalence

Visual-ERM is a multimodal generative reward model that evaluates vision-to-code outputs in rendered visual space, improving Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct by up to 8.4 points and outperforming larger models on fine-grained visual discrepancy benchmarks.

Ziyu Liu, Shengyuan Ding, Xinyu Fang, Xuanlang Dai, Penghui Yang, Jiaqi Wang, Kai Chen, Dahua Lin, Yuhang Zang

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 6 · Thu, Dec 10, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4▲ 21 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 69arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

88%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel15/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 8/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Vision-to-code tasks require models to reconstruct structured visual inputs, such as charts, tables, and SVGs, into executable or structured representations with high visual fidelity. While recent Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong results via supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning remains challenging due to misaligned reward signals. Existing rewards either rely on textual rules or coarse visual embedding similarity, both of which fail to capture fine-grained visual discrepancies and are vulnerable to reward hacking. We propose Visual Equivalence Reward Model (Visual-ERM), a multimodal generative reward model that provides fine-grained, interpretable, and task-agnostic feedback to evaluate vision-to-code quality directly in the rendered visual space. Integrated into RL, Visual-ERM improves Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct by +8.4 on chart-to-code and yields consistent gains on table and SVG parsing (+2.7, +4.1 on average), and further strengthens test-time scaling via reflection and revision. We also introduce VisualCritic-RewardBench (VC-RewardBench), a benchmark for judging fine-grained image-to-image discrepancies on structured visual data, where Visual-ERM at 8B decisively outperforms Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct and approaches leading closed-source models. Our results suggest that fine-grained visual reward supervision is both necessary and sufficient for vision-to-code RL, regardless of task specificity.