Good Papers

Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVR

Archer applies entropy-aware dual-token constraints to RLVR, modulating optimization strengths across reasoning and knowledge tokens to improve mathematical and code performance.

Jiakang Wang, Runze Liu, Fuzheng Zhang, Xiu Li, Guorui Zhou, Kun Gai, Ling Pan

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 3 · Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4▲ 21 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 44arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

80%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 8/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become an effective post-training method for improving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods mainly apply uniform optimization constraints across all tokens, ignoring their heterogeneous roles. Prior work shows that high-entropy tokens are closely tied to reasoning, while low-entropy tokens primarily encode factual knowledge, and recent approaches attempt to exploit this distinction by isolating token updates via masking or asynchronous training. We argue that such isolation breaks the sequential dependency structure of autoregressive generation, leading to suboptimal learning. To address this, we propose \textbf{Archer}, an entropy-aware RLVR framework with \textbf{dual-token constraints} that preserves joint optimization while modulating update strength across token types. Our method introduces response-level entropy normalization for stable token classification and applies differentiated clipping ranges and KL regularization to encourage exploration on reasoning tokens while preserving knowledge tokens. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks show that Archer consistently outperforms strong baselines across multiple model scales, improving both \textit{pass@1} and \textit{pass@K} performance. These results highlight the importance of respecting sequence-level dependencies when designing fine-grained RL optimization strategies for LLMs.