Good Papers

Step-by-Step Optimization-like Reasoning in LLMs over Expanding Search Spaces

OPT* introduces optimization-style tasks with expanding search spaces and feasibility checkers to evaluate LLM step-by-step reasoning, showing that training on it improves optimization-like reasoning via online policy optimization and search-based offline RL.

Nicolás Astorga, Nabeel Seedat, Mihaela van der Schaar

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 3 · Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

74%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel9/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 5/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Verifiable reward training has improved mathematical and coding reasoning, but these domains capture only part of step-by-step decision making. Many real-world tasks require finding a high-value feasible plan among many valid alternatives. We introduce OPT*, a scalable family of optimization-style tasks for training and evaluating LLM step-by-step optimization-like reasoning along a complexity axis: each task provides a feasibility checker and evaluator, while a complexity parameter expands the search space without requiring new human labels. This motivates studying these tasks in two regimes: (i) solver-guided online policy optimization, which uses a solver as a value oracle for partial states and applies rank-based reward shaping to reinforce better next steps, and (ii) search-based offline RL when such solvers are unavailable. Theoretically, we relate success in large search spaces to the information a reasoner extracts per unit of search budget. Empirically, we ablate the ingredients that make search efficient on OPT* and show that training on OPT* improves step-by-step optimization-like reasoning.