Good Papers

TIER: Trajectory-Invariant Execution Rewards for Multi-Step Tool Composition

TIER derives dense tool-use rewards from execution and schemas rather than reference paths, enabling over 90% accuracy on multi-step composition where trajectory supervision fails.

Anay Kulkarni, Chia En Lu, Dheeraj Mekala, Jayanth Srinivasa, Gaowen Liu, Jingbo Shang

Published 2026Atlanta Poster Session 4 · Thu, Dec 10, 4:30 PM–7:30 PM local time · Hall C1arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

88%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel15/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 10/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Tool use enables large language models to solve complex tasks through sequences of API calls, yet existing reinforcement learning approaches fail to scale to multi-step composition settings. Outcome-based rewards provide only sparse feedback, while trajectory-supervised rewards depend on annotated reference solutions, penalizing valid alternatives and limiting scalability. We propose TIER: Trajectory-Invariant Execution Rewards, a reward framework that derives supervision directly from function schemas and runtime execution, rather than from reference trajectories. The reward decomposes into format validity, schema adherence, execution success, and answer correctness, providing dense, interpretable sequence-level feedback derived from fine-grained verification of individual steps of tool use. This design allows any valid execution path to receive credit, naturally supporting multiple solution strategies and adapting to evolving tool interfaces. On DepthBench, a compositional benchmark stratified by depth (1 to 6 steps), TIER achieves >90% accuracy across steps, where trajectory-supervised rewards collapse beyond step-4. We further demonstrate consistent gains on benchmarks like BFCL v3 and NestFUL. Ablation studies confirm that all reward components are necessary, highlighting the importance of multi-level supervision for compositional reasoning.