HiPLEX: Hierarchical Policy Factorization for Full Duplex Speech Language Models
HiPLEX factorizes full-duplex speech policies into timing and content controllers to jointly optimize interaction dynamics via reinforcement learning. It lowers takeover rates, reduces interruption latency, and improves human-like turn timing versus GRPO.
Published Oct 6, 2026arXiv ↗

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.
HiPLEX's factorized RL split of timing and content via event-causal masks is a genuinely scalable framing, but the lack of mask ablations, narrow Moshi seeds, and pooled marginals leave its gains under-isolated.
Abstract
As human--AI interactions become more conversational, full-duplex speech language models capable of natural real-time dialogue are growing in importance. Beyond generating appropriate responses, these models must coordinate turn-taking, backchanneling, and floor management in real time. Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a way to refine these behaviors through direct feedback on interaction outcomes. However, existing RL methods either apply timing feedback to a token policy or optimize semantic content, leaving the joint improvement of timing and content unresolved. We introduce HiPLEX, an RL framework that factorizes a pretrained full-duplex text policy into a control policy that decides when to emit content and a conditional content policy that decides what to emit. The first factor selects among 'pad', 'epad', and 'con'. The second selects a token only when 'con' is chosen. This hierarchy describes conditional actions within each frame and uses the model's existing text head. We route timing advantages to the token-group factor through event-causal masks derived from generated speech episodes, and route an LLM-judge semantic advantage to the conditional content factor. Across three Moshi seeds on Full-Duplex-Bench v1, HiPLEX reduces takeover rates during natural user pauses and backchannel opportunities, and shortens post-interruption response latency relative to GRPO, while maintaining comparable judged interruption-response quality. On Moshi and PersonaPlex, HiPLEX better matches pooled human turn-timing and backchannel-rate marginals than GRPO.