Good Papers

LLM2R: From Large Language Models to 3D Reassemblers

LLM2R casts multi-part 3D assembly as sequence modeling with a pretrained LLM, predicting all poses in one pass to surpass existing methods on large part sets and unseen categories.

Published Oct 13, 2026

72%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel13/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 7/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

3D part assembly aims to reconstruct a complete shape from a set of unassembled parts by predicting a rigid SE(3) transformation for each part. Because the placement of a part is rarely determined by its own geometry, the task demands reasoning over the entire part set, and existing methods, which rely on pairwise relations or iterative generation and verification, scale poorly to objects with many parts. We present LLM2R, which casts part assembly as sequence modeling with a pretrained decoder-only large language model (LLM): a Point-BERT encoder and a Q-Former compress each part into a block of geometric tokens, the blocks of all parts are concatenated, and a causal LLM adapted with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) processes the sequence in one forward pass. Causal attention, however, lets the hidden states of a part observe only the parts that precede it. LLM2R therefore appends a block of learnable summary tokens after the last part: these tokens follow every part, so their states aggregate the whole assembly at a constant token cost, and a part-aware pose head fuses each part's states with them before predicting its rotation and translation. One architecture thus handles semantic and geometric assembly and predicts all poses in a single non-autoregressive pass. LLM2R achieves the highest part accuracy and success rate on all three PartNet categories, the best rotation error, translation error, and part accuracy on PartNeXt, and the lowest translation error and fastest inference on Breaking Bad, where only a fracture-specialized method is more accurate. Its advantage grows with the number of parts: at 100 parts it exceeds GARF by 33.5 points in part accuracy on Breaking Bad and Assembler by 29.1 points on PartNet, and it transfers zero-shot to unseen categories with more than 16 points higher part accuracy than the strongest of three baselines.

Are you an author?

Good Papers badgeAuthor of this paper? Add this badge to your README or page
[![Good Papers](https://www.goodpapers.org/badge/W7221834790.svg)](https://www.goodpapers.org/paper/W7221834790)