57%Worth a look?Worth a lookVote to see the scoreNeurIPS 2026SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITYTencent AI for Life Sciences LabTencentTsinghua University, TsinghuaThe Hong Kong University of ScieGenomics & single-cellWaveSem: Frequency-Adaptive Tokenization for Disentangling Semantics and Noise in GenomicsShou Z Chen, Bing He, Zhenchao Tang, Jun Zhu and 8 moreSydney Poster Session 5, Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026– ReadersNo votes yet1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend itReaders and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.Worth readingNot for meOnly vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend itlenient 1/5medium 0/10strict 0/5
45%Niche pick?Niche pickVote to see the scoreNeurIPS 2026WestlakeTencent AI LabTencentTencent AI for Life Sciences LabThe Hong Kong University of ScieGenomics & single-cellUGM: Unified Multi-scale Genomic Event Modeling with Site-level Joint PredictionJiayang Wu, Chenchen Qin, Xu YANG, Yu Zhao and 7 moreSydney Poster Session 2, Tue, Dec 8, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026– ReadersNo votes yet0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend itReaders and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.Worth readingNot for meOnly vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend itlenient 0/5medium 0/10strict 0/5
89%Must read?Must readVote to see the scoreNeurIPS 2026TencentHarbin Institute of TechnologyHong Kong PolytechnicWestlakeJiangnanAlignment & preference optimizationAligning LLMs with Biomedical Knowledge using Balanced Fine-TuningBalanced Fine-Tuning uses dual-scale token and sequence reweighting targeting dense epistemic uncertainty to align LLMs with biomedical knowledge, improving reasoning and sparse-reward RL over standard fine-tuning.Zhenchao Tang, Fang Wang, Haohuai He, Jiale Zhou and 12 moreSydney Poster Session 5, Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026– ReadersNo votes yet16/20 AI panelreviewers recommend itReaders and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.Worth readingNot for meOnly vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.AI panel: 16 of 20 reviewers recommend itlenient 5/5medium 9/10strict 2/5