Automata from Agent Traces: Failure and Next-Step Prediction
Trace corpora collapse into compact finite-state machines replaying held-out data at >=0.997 fitness, yielding state-context next-step prediction and 0.94 AUROC failure prediction for runtime monitoring.
Published 2026Paris Poster Session 2 · Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–7:00 PM local time · Paris Poster Hall▲ 5 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗OpenReview ↗
Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.
A compact, millisecond-built FSM achieves near-perfect replay and strong failure prediction across datasets, but missing cross-harness drift tests, static-graph baselines, and latency benchmarks leave its harness-agnostic topology and online monitor unproven.
Abstract
LLM-based agents execute multi-step tasks, but their behavioral structure remains opaque: long unstructured traces resist the safety auditing and runtime monitoring that deployment requires. Existing approaches operate per-trace or success-only, so they miss the cross-run topology that links next-step and failure prediction. To recover that shared structure, we collapse an entire trace corpus into a single, compact finite-state machine (FSM) that serves as a structural substrate for the otherwise unpredictable behavior of LLM agents. Across twelve public datasets, the FSMs are compact (7-43 states), replay held-out data at >=0.997 fitness with near-identical topology across splits, and build in milliseconds. This substrate addresses both prediction goals. For next-step prediction, FSM-state context outperforms Agent Workflow Memory on every ground-truth-matched dataset. For failure prediction, per-state behavioral features reach held-out AUROC up to 0.94, and an online monitor ranks failing runs above passing ones from a partial trace, triggering early stopping well before completion. Behavioral topology thus appears shaped more by the deployment harness than by the LLM, providing a model-agnostic structural primitive for safety auditing and runtime monitoring.