Good Papers

PhysVista: Benchmarking Physical Intelligence in VLMs via a Perception-Reasoning-Assessment Loop

PhysVista benchmarks physical intelligence in vision-language models via a perception-reasoning-assessment loop, exposing major gaps in physical reasoning and plausibility assessment.

Xinge Peng, Yiting Lu, tianwu zhi, Wen Wen, Jianzhao Liu, Xin Li, Zhibo Chen

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 6 · Thu, Dec 10, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4▲ 30 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

78%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel11/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 6/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, yet whether they truly capture the physical consistency underlying real-world dynamics remains unclear. Existing benchmark paradigms often suffer from fragmented evaluation, focusing on isolated cognitive stages while overlooking the inherent synergy between perception, reasoning, and physical judgment. The lack of a holistic perspective limits the ability to diagnose whether VLMs can reliably evaluate the physical authenticity of emerging generative models. To address these issues, we introduce PhysVista, a benchmark designed to evaluate physical intelligence in VLMs through a closed cognitive loop framework inspired by the human seeing-reasoning-assessment process. PhysVista restores this loop by jointly evaluating physical state perception, physical dynamics reasoning, and physical plausibility assessment. It further distinguishes event-level reasoning and scale-level reasoning to enable fine-grained analysis of physical understanding. In addition, PhysVista incorporates both real-world and AI-generated videos, allowing evaluation across diverse domains and emerging generative scenarios. Extensive experiments across a diverse set of VLMs reveal substantial limitations in physical reasoning and plausibility assessment, highlighting a persistent gap between visual recognition and genuine physical understanding, and pointing toward more principled designs for physically grounded multimodal intelligence.