Good Papers

ICAT: Incident-Case–Grounded Adaptive Testing for Physical-Risk Prediction in Embodied World Models

ICAT grounds physical-risk testing of embodied world models in real incident reports to expose frequent missed dangers and severity miscalibration.

Zhenglin Lai, Sirui Huang, Yuteng Li, Changxin Huang, Jianqiang Li, Bingzhe Wu

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 1 · Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

78%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel11/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 6/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Video-generative world models are increasingly used as neural simulators for embodied planning and policy learning, yet their ability to predict physical risk and severe consequences is rarely evaluated.We find that these models often downplay or omit key danger cues and severe outcomes for hazardous actions, which can induce unsafe preferences during planning and training on imagined rollouts. We propose ICAT, which grounds testing in real incident reports and safety manuals by building structured risk memories and retrieving/composing them to constrain the generation of risk cases with causal chains and severity labels. Experiments on an ICAT-based benchmark show that mainstream world models frequently miss mechanisms and triggering conditions and miscalibrate severity, falling short of the reliability required for safety-critical embodied deployment.