Good Papers

Chaining 2-FWL GNNs for Combinatorial Graph Alignment

Chaining 2-FWL GNNs injects discrete combinatorial feedback via iterative ranking to solve graph alignment, outperforming classical and prior GNN baselines across synthetic and real-world benchmarks.

Marc Lelarge

Published 2026Paris Poster Session 3 · Thu, Dec 10, 12:30 PM–2:30 PM local time · Paris Poster HallarXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

88%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel15/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 3/5
medium 9/10
strict 3/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

For the combinatorial graph alignment problem (GAP) -- finding the node correspondence that maximizes the number of common edges (nce) between two unlabeled graphs -- properly initialized FAQ remains a strong classical baseline, while existing GNN approaches struggle in the purely structural setting. We introduce a chaining procedure: a sequence of Folklore-type (2-FWL) GNNs in which each network is trained with cross-entropy after decoding the previous network's similarity matrix and ranking nodes by their current alignment quality. This non-differentiable ranking step injects discrete combinatorial feedback at every link; at inference, we iterate the final network and keep the candidate with highest observed nce. On sparse Erdos-Renyi graphs at noise level 0.25, chained FGNNs with FAQ post-processing reach 85% accuracy versus 13% for FAQ initialized from the convex relaxation, and essentially 0% for prior GNN methods. On correlated regular graphs, where MPNNs with constant features produce identical node embeddings (1-WL fails to refine) and FAQ's convex initialization is degenerate, chaining is the only method we know that recovers a non-trivial alignment. On three real-world benchmarks (yeast PPI, coauthorship, and road networks), we show that recent comparisons underestimate FAQ by initializing it from a uniform doubly stochastic matrix; once FAQ is initialized from the convex relaxation it already surpasses prior reported numbers, and dataset-specific chained FGNNs further improve on this strengthened baseline.