Good Papers

LensVLM: Selective Context Expansion for Compressed Visual Representation of Text

LensVLM lets VLMs scan compressed rendered text and selectively expand only relevant regions via learned tools, maintaining near-full accuracy at 4.3x compression and outperforming baselines up to 10.1x across text QA benchmarks.

Roy Xie, Dan Friedman, Donghan Yu, Bowen Pan, Christopher Fifty, Jang-Hyun Kim, Xianzhi Du, Zhe Gan, Vivek Rathod, Bhuwan Dhingra

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 5 · Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4▲ 7 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

89%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel16/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 9/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Vision Language Models (VLMs) offer the exciting possibility of processing text as rendered images, bypassing the need for tokenizing the text into long token sequences. Since VLM image encoders map fixed-size images to a fixed number of visual tokens, varying rendering resolution provides a fine-grained compression knob. However, accuracy deteriorates quickly as compression increases: characters shrink below the vision encoder's effective resolution, making them indistinguishable. To address this, we propose LensVLM, an inference framework and post-training recipe that enables VLMs to scan compressed images, then selectively expand only the relevant images to their uncompressed form via learned tools. Building on Qwen3.5-9B-Base, LensVLM maintains accuracy comparable to the full-text upper bound at 4.3$\times$ effective compression and outperforms retrieval-based, text- and visual-compression baselines up to 10.1$\times$ effective compression across seven text QA benchmarks. LensVLM also generalizes to multimodal document and code understanding tasks, with the accuracy gain over baselines growing as compression increases. Our analysis validates this approach: training makes visual compression robust to rendering choices, and as compression grows the model increasingly relies on expanded content rather than unreliable visual reading. The analysis also yields practical tool-choice guidance: text expansion is preferable for rendered text, while high-resolution image expansion suits native documents whose layout cues carry task-relevant information.