Good Papers
NeurIPS 2026PrivacyStanford

Shuffle and Joint Differential Privacy for Generalized Linear Contextual Bandits

Algorithms for generalized linear contextual bandits achieve shuffle-DP regret scaling as $\tilde O(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T}/\sqrt{\varepsilon})$ and joint-DP regret matching non-private rates plus additive privacy corrections without spectral assumptions.

Sahasrajit Sarmasarkar

Published 2026Paris Poster Session 5 · Fri, Dec 11, 11:30 AM–1:30 PM local time · Paris Poster HallarXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

74%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel9/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 2/5
medium 4/10
strict 3/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

We present the first algorithms for generalized linear contextual bandits under shuffle differential privacy and joint differential privacy. While prior work on private contextual bandits has been restricted to linear reward models -- which admit closed-form estimators -- generalized linear models (GLMs) pose fundamental new challenges: no closed-form estimator exists, requiring private convex optimization; privacy must be tracked across multiple evolving design matrices; and optimization error must be explicitly incorporated into regret analysis. We address these challenges under two privacy models and context settings. For stochastic contexts, we design a shuffle-DP algorithm achieving $\tilde{O}(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T \log T}/\sqrt{\varepsilon})$ regret in dominant term, differing from the non-private rate by a factor of $\sqrt{d/\varepsilon}$. For adversarial contexts, we provide a joint-DP algorithm with regret $\tilde{O}\!\big(d\sqrt{T} \log T + d^{3/4}\sqrt{T/\varepsilon}\,(\log T)\,(d + \log T)^{1/4}\big)$ -- matching the non-private rate $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{T} \log T)$ in the leading term, with privacy contributing only an additive correction. Unlike prior work on locally private GLM bandits, our methods require no spectral assumptions on the context distribution beyond $\ell_2$ boundedness.