Good Papers

Beyond Maximum Likelihood: Variational Inequality Estimation for Generalized Linear Models

A variational-inequality framework estimates generalized linear models via equilibrium conditions, yielding finite-sample bounds, asymptotic normality, and improved stability over maximum likelihood for non-canonical links.

Linglingzhi Zhu, Jonghyeok Lee, Yao Xie

Published 2026Atlanta Poster Session 1 · Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall C1arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

70%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel5/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 2/5
medium 2/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Generalized linear models (GLMs) are fundamental tools for statistical modeling, with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) serving as the classical approach for parameter inference. While MLE performs well for canonical GLMs, it can become computationally challenging in more general settings with non-canonical, non-smooth, or nonlinear link functions, where the resulting optimization landscape may be ill-conditioned, non-convex, or non-differentiable. In this paper, we study an alternative estimation framework based on variational inequalities (VIs), which formulates GLM estimation through an operator-based equilibrium condition rather than likelihood minimization. We analyze the VI estimator from a statistical perspective and establish finite-sample error bounds and asymptotic normality under mild regularity conditions, together with convergence guarantees for fixed-point and stochastic approximation algorithms. The framework accommodates a broad class of link functions, including non-canonical and non-monotone cases satisfying a strong Minty-type condition, and extends naturally to generalized additive models via basis expansion. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the VI approach achieves competitive finite-sample accuracy and improved numerical stability relative to MLE, particularly in GLMs and GAMs with non-canonical or non-smooth link functions.