Good Papers

Derived Fields Preserve Fine-Scale Detail in Budgeted Neural Simulators

Derived-Field Optimization selects carried physical fields and allocates storage budgets to preserve fine-scale detail in budgeted neural simulators, significantly improving fidelity before rollout even on PDEBench.

Wenshuo Wang, Fan Zhang

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 4 · Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

86%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel14/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 3/5
medium 9/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Fine-scale-faithful neural simulation under fixed storage budgets remains challenging. Many existing methods reduce high-frequency error by improving architectures, training objectives, or rollout strategies. However, under budgeted coarsen-quantize-decode pipelines, fine detail can already be lost when the carried state is constructed. In the canonical periodic incompressible Navier-Stokes setting, we show that primitive and derived fields undergo systematically different retained-band distortions under the same operator. Motivated by this observation, we formulate Derived-Field Optimization (DerivOpt), a general state-design framework that chooses which physical fields are carried and how storage budget is allocated across them under a calibrated channel model. Across the full time-dependent forward subset of PDEBench, DerivOpt not only improves pooled mean rollout nRMSE, but also delivers a decisive advantage in fine-scale fidelity over a broad set of strong baselines. More importantly, the gains are already visible at input time, before rollout learning begins. This indicates that the carried state is often the dominant bottleneck under tight storage budgets. These results suggest a broader conclusion: in budgeted neural simulation, carried-state design should be treated as a first-class design axis alongside architecture, loss, and rollout strategy.