Good Papers

Latent Generative Solvers for Generalizable Long-Term Physics Simulation

LGS is a latent generative solver combining a physics VAE, flow-matching transformer, and noised training to stabilize long autoregressive rollouts across diverse PDEs with far less compute.

Zituo Chen, Sili Deng

Published 2026Atlanta Poster Session 1 · Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall C1arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

83%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel13/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 2/5
medium 8/10
strict 3/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Reliable physics simulation demands two capabilities that today's neural PDE solvers do not deliver together: generalization across heterogeneous PDE families, and stability under long autoregressive rollouts. Deterministic operators accumulate error geometrically, while existing probabilistic solvers are confined to a single PDE family or short horizons. We close this gap with the \textbf{Latent Generative Solver} (LGS), three coupled components: (i) a Physics VAE (PhyVAE) compressing twelve PDE families into a shared latent manifold; (ii) a Pyramidal Flow-Forcing Transformer (PFlowFT) that generates the next latent by flow matching, conditioned on a per-trajectory context updated on the model's own predictions; and (iii) input noising during training, for which we derive a sufficient-condition contraction bound explaining the observed long-horizon stability. Pretrained on a 2.5\,M-trajectory, 16-system corpus at $128^2$, LGS matches the strongest deterministic baseline at one step, wins on 15/16 systems at both 5- and 10-step rollout, cuts 20-step L2RE from $56.1\%$ to $\mathbf{30.2\%}$, and uses $\mathbf{13}$--$\mathbf{77\times}$ less recurrent dynamics-step compute. It also adapts efficiently to a $256^2$ Kolmogorov flow held out from the pretraining corpus, dropping 1-step L2RE from $0.398$ to $0.129$ in five finetune epochs against U-AFNO's $0.653{\to}0.343$. These empirical claims are limited to the evaluated 2D regular-grid systems and discrete horizons.