Good Papers

Why Latent Actions Fail, and How to Prevent It

Standard reconstruction in latent action models encodes exogenous future state, but endogenous representations and action supervision prevent this failure.

Jung Min Lee, Taehyun Cho, Li Zhao, Jungwoo Lee

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 5 · Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

80%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 6/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Latent action models (LAMs) aim to learn action-like representations from unlabeled videos by compressing frame-to-frame changes. The frames of in-the-wild videos, however, contain not only the agent's own state but exogenous state such as background clutter. Since the exogenous state introduces changes unrelated to actions, it hinders reliable latent action learning. This paper investigates this problem analytically by extending a linear LAM framework to explicitly model exogenous state. Our analysis reveals two insights: (1) minimizing the standard reconstruction objective produces latent actions that encode exogenous information from future observation; and (2) learning in a representation space that focuses on endogenous components is a key to mitigating the interference of noise. We further show that previously proposed auxiliary objectives, such as action-supervision, provably encourage latent actions to be consistent across exogenous states. These findings are validated through experiments on both linear and nonlinear LAMs, providing a unified theoretical analysis of how exogenous state hinders latent action learning and why common remedies work.