Good Papers

ThousandWorlds: A benchmark for climate emulation of potentially habitable exoplanets

ThousandWorlds introduces a multi-model exoplanet climate benchmark of ~1,700 GCM simulations, showing Gaussian processes outperform deep learning in low-data multi-simulator regression.

Edward Stevenson, Mei T Mak, Eric Wolf, Denis E Sergeev, Tobi Hammond, Nathan Mayne, Miles Cranmer

Published 2026Paris Poster Session 1 · Wed, Dec 9, 12:30 PM–2:30 PM local time · Paris Poster Hall▲ 1 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

89%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel16/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 8/10
strict 3/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

The search for life beyond Earth will depend on detecting faint signatures in the atmospheres of potentially habitable exoplanets. Interpreting those signatures requires understanding the host planet's climate: the same molecule may signal life on one planet and abiotic chemistry on another. Global climate models (GCMs) provide this understanding, but individual runs can require up to millions of core-hours and substantial domain expert time. Machine-learning emulators could remove this bottleneck, but progress has been limited by the absence of a curated, multi-model exoclimate dataset. We introduce ThousandWorlds, an ML-ready benchmark for exoclimate emulation and for the broader regime of low-data, multi-simulator, parameter-to-field regression. The dataset contains approximately 1,700 simulations from five GCMs, mapping eight planet parameters to 3D atmospheric fields including temperature, humidity, winds, clouds, and radiation. Three nested subsets define progressively harder challenges: single-simulator regression, multi-simulator regression with complete observations, and multi-simulator regression with structured missingness. We propose two evaluation protocols: one for ranking methods, and one that measures performance relative to the disagreement between GCMs themselves. We evaluate ten baselines spanning simple methods, trees, deep learning, and Gaussian processes. GP-based methods perform best, suggesting that ThousandWorlds exposes a regime where off-the-shelf deep learning does not yet succeed. Data: https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8695. Code: https://github.com/edstevenson/ThousandWorlds.