Good Papers

Causal Abstractions, Categorically Unified

A categorical framework defines causal abstractions as natural transformations between Markov functors, unifying prior notions, yielding graphical consistency conditions, and validating high-level do-calculus on low-level graphs with unobserved confounders.

Markus Englberger, Devendra Singh Dhami

Published 2026Paris Poster Session 4 · Thu, Dec 10, 5:30 PM–7:30 PM local time · Paris Poster HallarXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

70%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel4/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 2/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

We present a categorical framework for relating causal models that represent the same system at different levels of abstraction. We define a causal abstraction as natural transformations between appropriate Markov functors, which concisely consolidate desirable properties a causal abstraction should exhibit. Our approach unifies and generalizes previously considered causal abstractions, and we obtain categorical proofs and generalizations of existing results on causal abstractions. Using string diagrammatical tools, we can explicitly describe the graphs that serve as consistent abstractions of a low-level graph under interventions. We discuss how methods from mechanistic interpretability, such as circuit analysis and sparse autoencoders, fit within our categorical framework. We also show how applying do-calculus on a high-level graphical abstraction of an acyclic-directed mixed graph (ADMG), when unobserved confounders are present, gives valid results on the low-level graph, thus generalizing an earlier statement by Anand et al. (2023). We argue that our framework is more suitable for modeling causal abstractions compared to existing categorical frameworks. Finally, we discuss how notions such as $τ$-consistency and constructive $τ$-abstractions can be recovered with our framework.