Good Papers

Geometry-Constrained Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks: Learning Edge Geometry via Banach Duality

Geometry-constrained KANs learn per-edge Banach exponents via duality to adapt function-space geometry, matching fixed-basis baselines on symbolic regression while improving noise robustness and small-sample accuracy.

Senanayak Sesh Kumar Karri

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 4 · Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

83%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel13/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 3/5
medium 8/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) replace fixed activations in deep architectures with learnable univariate edge functions, making the choice of edge parametrisation central. Existing variants rely on fixed bases such as splines, polynomials, or Fourier features, which impose a function-space geometry before data are observed. We introduce geometry-constrained KANs, a family of edge activations derived from Banach duality maps in which the geometry itself is learned through a scalar exponent $p > 1$ per edge. This exponent controls the qualitative response: sub-Euclidean values produce sharp, threshold-like behaviour reminiscent of the $\ell_1$ (LASSO) geometry, $p = 2$ recovers the linear regime, and larger values produce flatter responses near the origin. Across 50 symbolic-regression targets ($40$ from the AI Feynman benchmark plus $10$ synthetic stress tests), geometry-constrained KANs match or beat every fixed-basis baseline on median NRMSE (Banach-KAN $0.030$, tying Chebyshev and improving on splines); on average rank Banach-KAN is best on the $18$-equation core ($2.00$) and statistically tied with the strongest spline on the full benchmark ($2.32$ vs. $2.34$). The clearest gains appear under measurement noise: as $σ$ grows from $0$ to $1$, $\ell^p$-KAN degrades only $3.7\times$ -- below even a cross-validated spline ($\approx 11\times$) -- while an unregularised spline degrades $21.6\times$; Banach-KAN degrades $8.8\times$, comparable to a tuned spline but far more stable than the unregularised one. Banach-KAN also takes the most per-equation wins in the small-sample regime, with fixed-basis models catching up only as the training set grows. Learned exponents provide an interpretable, relative signal: at a fixed initialisation they reveal a consistent, target-dependent geometric ordering across equation families and input dimensions.