Good Papers

Known By Their Actions: Fingerprinting LLM Browser Agents via UI Traces

UI traces from LLM web agents identify underlying models with 96% F1 via passive JavaScript tracking, though randomized delays only partially mitigate fingerprinting.

William Gitta Lugoloobi, Samuele Marro, Jabez Magomere, Joss Wright, Chris Russell

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 4 · Wed, Dec 9, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4Code ★ 7arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

89%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel16/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 8/10
strict 3/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

As LLM-based agents increasingly browse the web on users' behalf, a natural question arises: can websites passively identify which underlying model powers an agent? Doing so would represent a significant security risk, enabling targeted attacks tailored to known model vulnerabilities. Across 14 frontier LLMs and four web environments spanning information retrieval and shopping tasks, we show that an agent's actions and interaction timings, captured via a passive JavaScript tracker, are sufficient to identify the underlying model with up to 96\% F1. We formalise this attack surface by demonstrating that classifiers trained on agent actions generalise across model sizes and families. We further show that strong classifiers can be trained from few interaction traces and that agent identity can be inferred early within an episode. Injecting randomised timing delays between actions substantially degrades classifier performance, but does not provide robust protection: a classifier retrained on delayed traces largely recovers performance. We release our harness and a labelled corpus of agent traces \href{https://github.com/KabakaWilliam/known_actions}{here}.