Good Papers

DriveSpatial: A Benchmark for Spatiotemporal Intelligence in VLMs for Autonomous Driving

DriveSpatial benchmarks vision-language models' spatiotemporal autonomous driving intelligence, finding a 28.4-point human gap with cognitive scene construction as the key bottleneck.

Anh Hao Vo, Khoa Vo, Phu Loc Nguyen, Sieu Tran, Duc Nguyen, Ngo X Cuong, Gladys Gawugah, Sreevenkata A Godavarthi, Chase Rainwater, Nghi Bui, Anh Nguyen, Duy M. H. Nguyen, Ngan Le

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 5 · Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

91%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel18/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 10/10
strict 3/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Spatiotemporal intelligence in autonomous driving (AD) requires an agent to integrate multi-view observations into a coherent scene representation, maintain object continuity across viewpoints and time, and reason about spatial relations, interactions, and future dynamics. However, existing AD vision-language benchmarks largely focus on single-view, static, ego-centric, or single-source question answering, leaving it unclear whether current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can truly construct and reason over dynamic driving scenes. We introduce DriveSpatial, a benchmark of 15.6K human-verified QA pairs across 20 tasks from five large-scale AD datasets. DriveSpatial evaluates four abilities: Cognitive Scene Construction, Multi-view Relational Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Generalization. Unlike prior benchmarks, DriveSpatial is generated from a dynamic multi-relational scene graph that encodes object states, spatial relations, interactions, camera visibility, and temporal correspondences, enabling QA pairs that enforce genuine cross-view and spatiotemporal reasoning. Evaluating 15 representative VLMs reveals a substantial human-model gap: the strongest model trails humans by 28.4 points, with Cognitive Scene Construction emerging as the key bottleneck. Further diagnostics show that language-only prompting is insufficient, while explicit BEV grounding consistently improves performance. These results suggest that current VLMs lack the scene-construction ability needed for reliable spatiotemporal driving intelligence. DriveSpatial and its construction pipeline will be released to support future research.