Good Papers

ColorConceptBench: A Benchmark for Probabilistic Color-Concept Understanding in Text-to-Image Models

ColorConceptBench evaluates text-to-image models on probabilistic color associations for 1,281 implicit concepts, revealing substantial performance gaps and insensitivity to abstract semantics.

Chenxi Ruan, Yihan Hou, Yu Xiao, Guosheng Hu, Wei Zeng

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 5 · Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

80%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 6/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Text-to-image (T2I) models have advanced considerably in generating high-quality images from textual descriptions. However, their ability to associate colors with concepts remains largely constrained to explicit color names or codes, while their capacity to handle \emph{implicit concepts}, such as emotions and visual states, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce ColorConceptBench, an expert-annotated benchmark that systematically evaluates color-concept associations through probabilistic color distributions. ColorConceptBench moves beyond explicit color specifications by examining how models interpret 1,281 implicit color concepts, grounded in 6,584 human annotations. Our evaluation of nine leading T2I models reveals that performance varies substantially across semantic categories, and models exhibit a significant lack of sensitivity to abstract semantics. These limitations persist even when applying classifier-free guidance scaling at inference time, suggesting that achieving human-like color understanding demands a shift in how models learn and represent implicit semantic meaning.