Good Papers

On the Design Space of Discrete Diffusion Online Adaptation for Molecular Optimization

Online discrete diffusion adaptation for molecular optimization finds acquisition, reward shaping, and debiasing complementarily boost reward, with replay and validity control stabilizing exploration to outperform offline and search baselines.

Trevor Chen, Ariel Dai, Jason Yang, Riccardo De Santi, Daniel Khalil, Wenda Chu, Nate Gruver, Pranav Murugan, Alexander Goldberg, Maruan Al-Shedivat, Yisong Yue

Published 2026Atlanta Poster Session 5 · Fri, Dec 11, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall C1arXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

80%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 6/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Molecular optimization often starts from a pretrained generative model that captures a broad prior over valid molecular structures. At test time, however, the goal is not to sample from this prior, but to use a limited oracle budget to shift generation toward task-specific high-reward molecules. We study this adaptation problem for discrete diffusion models. Each online round couples several choices. The loop must decide which candidates to evaluate, how rewards become model updates, which feedback to reuse, and how far to move beyond the pretrained prior. These choices have mostly been studied in isolation, leaving open whether they complement one another, become redundant, or interfere inside a full online adaptation loop. We conduct controlled studies across six small-molecule binding-affinity tasks and three protein-fitness tasks. We find that acquisition, reward shaping, and model debiasing provide complementary routes to higher reward, especially for small molecules. Replay further stabilizes learning, while validity penalties keep small-molecule exploration on the valid molecular manifold. Together, these findings point to a practical recipe for feedback-efficient molecular optimization: online fine-tuning with acquisition, reward shaping, debiasing, replay, and validity control. This recipe outperforms offline fine-tuning and inference-time search baselines under matched oracle-call budgets and GPU-hour accounting. The gains are largest when high-reward candidates require larger shifts from the pretrained prior.