Good Papers

Beyond Steering Vector: Flow-based Activation Steering for Inference-Time Intervention

FLAS learns a concept-conditioned flow field for multi-step activation steering that outperforms prompting on AxBench without per-concept tuning.

Zehao Jin, Ruixuan Deng, Junran Wang, Xinjie Shen, Chao Zhang

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 6 · Thu, Dec 10, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4▲ 1 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗OpenReview ↗

86%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel14/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 8/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Activation steering has emerged as a promising alternative for controlling language-model behavior at inference time by modifying intermediate representations while keeping model parameters frozen. However, large-scale evaluations such as AxBench show that existing steering methods are often outperformed by simple in-context prompting and generalize poorly to unseen concepts. We hypothesize that these limitations arise from unvalidated simplifying assumptions shared across prior methods, which typically restrict steering interventions to fixed, single-step, position-invariant transforms. We propose FLAS (Flow-based Activation Steering), which learns a general, concept-conditioned velocity field $v_t(h,t,c)$ that transports unsteered activations to steered ones without relying on these assumptions. On AxBench, FLAS is the first learned method to consistently outperform prompting, reaching held-out harmonic means of $1.015$ on Gemma-2-2B-IT and $1.113$ on Gemma-2-9B-IT without per-concept tuning. Analysis of the learned flow shows curved, multi-step, token-varying trajectories, which suggests that previous hypotheses on activation space geometry might be incomplete.