Good Papers

Scalable Fair Learning via Cramér-von Mises Regularization

A Cramér-von Mises fairness regularizer with O(B log B) complexity penalizes prediction-sensitive attribute dependence during training, achieving competitive fairness-utility trade-offs with lower overhead.

Albert Gimó Contreras, Mariia Vladimirova, Olga Petrova, Reda CHHAIBI, Patrick Loiseau

Published 2026Sydney Poster Session 1 · Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM local time · Hall 1-4OpenReview ↗

74%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel9/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 5/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
A scalable O(B log B) CvM fairness regularizer delivers rare sub-quadratic in-processing dependence penalties with strong fairness-utility results, though it never defines "genuine joint-distribution dependence," omits code and latency benchmarks, and leaves its theoretical parity links…

Abstract

A standard way to enforce group fairness in machine learning models is to add a fairness regularizer to the training loss. Existing dependence-based regularizers, however, are often computationally expensive, with per-batch costs that are typically quadratic or higher in the batch size $B$. We propose a novel group-fairness regularizer based on the Cramér-von-Mises (CvM) sensitivity index, which penalizes statistical dependence between model predictions and a sensitive attribute during training. Our method combines a rank-based CvM estimator with differentiable soft ranking, yielding a bounded training penalty with $\Oc(B \log B)$ per-batch complexity. This is the first sub-quadratic in-processing fairness method that targets genuine joint-distribution dependence.We further establish theoretical connections between the CvM regularizer and standard fairness metrics such as demographic parity and equality of opportunity.Experiments on tabular and image datasets show competitive fairness-utility trade-offs while substantially lowering training overhead compared to existing dependence-based regularizers.