Good Papers

EMBER: Predicting TCR--pMHC Binding Without a Docked Complex

EMBER predicts TCR-pMHC binding from independently folded monomers via SE(3)-invariant graphs, avoiding docking errors and outperforming complex-based methods across all metrics.

Published Oct 19, 2026▲ 2 on Hugging Face

66%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 6/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

We propose EMBER, a structure-based framework for TCR--pMHC binding prediction that eliminates the need for a predicted docked complex, and with it the placement error that dominates such predictions. Traditional structure-based predictors utilize the co-folded complex structure of the receptor and the antigen and interpret binding from its contact surface. Consequently, every downstream feature inherits any deviation the structure-prediction tool introduced. Methodologically, EMBER folds the TCR and pMHC independently, encodes them as SE(3)-invariant residue graphs, and compares their learned representations without constructing a shared coordinate frame. A relative pose is therefore not an input of the model, so placement error cannot propagate into the prediction. Computationally, EMBER preprocesses O(N+M) monomer folds where a complex-based predictor needs O(NM) operations. Experimentally, under epitope-disjoint evaluation with six retrained baselines, EMBER is first on every metric under all four folding tools, by 0.9 to 14.4% in micro-AUROC, 18.5 to 25.3% in micro-AUPRC and 10.6 to 24.1% in MCC. Its ranking is also up to 85% more stable across folding tools.

Are you an author?

Good Papers badgeAuthor of this paper? Add this badge to your README or page
[![Good Papers](https://www.goodpapers.org/badge/arxiv-2610.27334.svg)](https://www.goodpapers.org/paper/arxiv-2610.27334)