Good Papers

Can World and Action Modeling Benefit Each Other under Unified Causal Training?

Yue Su, Bokai Lin, Xinkai Wang, Chubin Zhang, Xiangnan Wu, Kuan Zhang, Weiyang Jin, Jiwen Yu, Yiming Li, Cewu Lu, Lixin Yang, Xihui Liu

Published Oct 15, 2026▲ 10 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 18arXiv ↗

73%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel9/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 3/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

World and action modeling are closely related, yet their reciprocal benefits under unified causal training remain unclear. We introduce OneWM, a simple framework for unified causal training that treats actions as both conditions for world prediction and targets for policy learning within a shared video-action architecture. Using this framework, we investigate whether learning forward dynamics conditioned on specified actions improves action learning, and whether learning to generate actions in turn improves action-conditioned world modeling. We use LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and RoboCasa365 as embodied testbeds to evaluate both policy learning and world modeling, complemented by real-world policy experiments. Learning the visual consequences of specified actions improves policy performance and generalization across changing scenes. In turn, action learning improves multi-view world-prediction fidelity under the same architecture. Together, these results answer both questions positively, supporting reciprocal benefits between world modeling and action generation under unified causal training.