Good Papers

Recursive Game Creator: An Agentic Product-Level Experience-Oriented Game Harness

Recursive Game Creator uses recursive Designer-Builder-Player-Reviewer loops to advance agentic games from prototypes to entertaining products, achieving 77.89 on GameCraft-Bench and 53.2% success on GameASG-Bench with higher user ratings.

Jiajun Chen, Haoyu Wu, Mingda Jia, Xihui Liu

Published Oct 6, 2026▲ 21 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 6arXiv ↗

78%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel11/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 6/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Recent game design agents have made substantial progress in generating playable games. However, program correctness does not ensure an enjoyable experience for players. We present Recursive Game Creator, an experience-oriented harness to advance agentic game development from rough game prototypes into entertaining games. Recursive Game Creator organizes recursive development around four components: Designer, Builder, Player, and Reviewer. The Designer translates user instructions and Reviewer's feedback into detailed plans. The Builder turns these plans into candidate games. The coding-native Player creates and executes reusable policies through programmatic interfaces to efficiently collect diverse gameplay trajectories, mitigating evaluation bias caused by slow GUI-based collection. The Reviewer uses carefully designed trajectory-based metrics to induce player preferences, integrating with visual evidence and explicit textual preferences to evaluate games against game-specific criteria. Finally, the Reviewer accepts the better version and provides improvement reviews for the next round, closing the recursive loop. Our method achieves state-of-the-art overall performance of 77.89 on GameCraft-Bench. On GameASG-Bench, it achieves a strict task success rate of 53.2%, a 34.1% improvement over the same-model baseline, and the highest mean runtime-check pass rate at 93.4% among compared methods. A user study shows longer playtime and higher ratings. Code is coming soon.