Good Papers

CheckerBench: Can Long-Horizon Agents Synthesize Static-Analysis Checkers?

CheckerBench evaluates long-horizon agents on synthesizing static-analysis checkers across 300 CVE-derived tasks, finding best Pass@1 reaches 45.33%.

Hang He, Li Wang, Hao Chen, Yuchen Shao, Yuling Shi, Lisheng Wang, Peiyang Liu, Goose Lin, Zaiyuan Wang, Haiying Sun, Ting Su, Chengcheng Wan

Published Oct 6, 2026▲ 52 on Hugging FaceCodearXiv ↗

84%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
?1 reader voted. Vote to see how they split.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 5/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Static-analysis checker synthesis requires agents to interpret a defect specification, inspect a repository, implement analyzer-specific logic, and refine the checker through repeated compilation and analysis feedback. Existing coding-agent benchmarks focus on tasks such as patch generation or vulnerability detection and rarely assess whether an agent can develop a working checker in a repository from start to finish. We introduce CheckerBench, an executable benchmark of 300 tasks derived from 297 CVEs across 167 repositories, 85 CWEs, and five language ecosystems. Each task includes vulnerable and fixed revisions, a pinned analysis environment, and a checker scaffold. We further introduce CheckerLab, a common evaluation framework that independently rebuilds submitted checkers and measures vulnerable-fixed diagnostic contrast, patch localization, false positives, and tool use. Across 21 model-harness configurations and three independent repeats per configuration, mean Pass@1 is 32.30%, while the best reaches 45.33%. These results show that reliable, reusable checker development remains challenging for current coding agents.