Good Papers

VIEScore2: Unified Image Evaluation with Spatially Grounded Explanations

VIEScore2 unifies synthetic image evaluation via grid-based joint score and defect localization predictions, outperforming zero-shot VLMs in correlation and spatial accuracy.

Xianda Du, Max Ku, Weiming Ren, Zhi Rui Tam, Chunlin Ren, Ping Nie, Min-Hung Chen, Wenhu Chen

Published Oct 1, 2026▲ 16 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 1arXiv ↗

80%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 6/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Existing synthetic image evaluators typically provide only a scalar quality score and do not identify the image regions that support it. We introduce VIEScore2, a unified evaluator for image generation and editing tasks with optional conditioning images. VIEScore2 represents an image as an N x N grid and jointly predicts quality scores and defect locations in a single model pass. Its text-native grid representation provides a common interface for heterogeneous spatial supervision and enables directly verifiable post-training objectives. We train on 38K examples spanning score-only, localization-only, and joint supervision across generation and editing tasks. Starting from supervised fine-tuning, we further apply GRPO to improve defect localization using rewards that combine cell-level Dice overlap, score accuracy, and output-format validity. A parameter-free parser converts the structured predictions into readable explanations. On the primary suite, VIEScore2 achieves an overall-score SRCC of 0.601, compared with 0.491 for Gemini-3-Flash, the strongest zero-shot general-purpose VLM baseline under matched inputs. For defect localization, VIEScore2 outperforms both general-purpose VLMs and specialized spatial evaluators on three of six benchmarks in per-image grid IoU and ranks among the top three on five, including datasets beyond its training sources.