Good Papers
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 2026AI in educationAjman

Teachers’ perceptions of ChatGPT support across TPACK domains: A cross-sectional survey in UAE schools

A UAE survey of 109 teachers found ChatGPT perceived as supportive across all TPACK domains, especially content knowledge over technological knowledge, with no demographic differences.

Mohd. Elmagzoub Eltahir, Frdose Mohd Elmagzoub Babiker

Published Oct 11, 2026Paper ↗

69%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel6/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 3/5
medium 2/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine teachers’ perceptions of ChatGPT support for instructional practices from the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework perspective. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, with data collected from 109 in-service teachers in the United Arab Emirates using a structured questionnaire measuring seven TPACK knowledge domains. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed to examine teachers’ perceptions of ChatGPT support across the TPACK domains and differences associated with demographic variables. The results indicate that teachers perceived ChatGPT as providing positive support across all TPACK domains. Content knowledge (CK) received the highest score, particularly for curriculum development, lesson planning, and instructional content preparation, whereas technological knowledge (TK) received the lowest score. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated a statistically significant difference between perceived ChatGPT support for CK and TK. No statistically significant differences were found in teachers’ perceptions of gender, teaching experience, or academic qualification. The findings suggest that ChatGPT is perceived as a useful instructional support tool across TPACK-related practices, while effective and responsible use requires stronger artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and technological competence. The study recommends professional development focusing on prompt design, critical evaluation of AI-generated content, bias awareness, privacy protection, and ethical AI use.