Good Papers

Scaling Trajectories for Complex Tasks through Recursive Self-Rewrite

Recursive Self-Rewrite uses diverse harnesses and recursive revision to rewrite successful terminal trajectories for supervised fine-tuning, boosting pass@3 by up to 7.6x on hard benchmarks.

Zongxia Li, Yucheng Shi, Zhongzhi Li, Junyao Yang, Ruhan Wang, Chengsong Huang, Fuxiao Liu, Haitao Mi, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber, LeoweiLiang

Published Oct 2, 2026▲ 91 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗

83%
OverallMust read
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel13/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 6/10
strict 2/5
Panel consensus
RSR delivers a sharply effective harness-to-runbook loop that lifts Terminal-Bench scores and outperforms direct SFT, though its small 759-task base, missing cross-model ablation, and unresolved leakage and memorization risks leave its true generalization uncertain.

Abstract

Successful trajectories on difficult tasks provide valuable supervision for model improvement, but specialized harnesses introduce interventions that may be unavailable during deployment. We propose Recursive Self-Rewrite (RSR), a framework that uses one base model, Qwen-3.8-27B, to discover successful solutions under diverse harnesses and reconstruct them as training trajectories under a general harness. A planner extracts procedures into runbooks, a critic screens for verifier and solution leakage and guides recursive revision, and an executor follows qualified runbooks in fresh sandboxes. Across approximately 3K self-curated terminal tasks, three harnesses jointly solve 759 tasks, 34.3% more than the strongest individual harness in the recorded pool. RSR expands 2,001 successful source trajectories into 11,094 rewritten trajectories for supervised finetuning. Training on these trajectories outperforms both the base model and direct trajectory SFT. Compared with the base model, pass@3 increases from 57.0% to 74.2% on Terminal-Bench 2, from 1.5% to 9.1% on Terminal-Bench 4, from 39.0% to 63.0% on our self-curated Terminal-Bench Hard, and from 3.0% to 6.0% on our Software Terminal-Bench. Process reward on Long-Horizon Terminal-Bench rises from 0.21 to 0.29. These results show how diverse harness-assisted experiences can be reconstructed into reusable capabilities for a model operating under a general harness.