Good Papers

FrugalEvo: Towards Cost-Aware LLM-Guided Program Evolution

FrugalEvo pairs expensive LLM strategy exploration with cheap LLM implementation and caching to maximize optimization gain per cost under a budget, outperforming baselines on 10 tasks at significantly lower expense.

Hui Chen, Xuan Qi, James Zhao, Zhaopeng Feng, Shilong Liu, Kuang Xu, Pang Wei Koh, Bryan Hooi

Published Oct 2, 2026▲ 22 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 5arXiv ↗

83%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel13/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 8/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
FrugalEvo earns praise for a clever high-cost strategy / low-cost refinement split and striking cost efficiency, though skeptics warn BA-AUC obscures maintainability and whether cache gains survive real-world prompt divergence.

Abstract

LLM-guided evolutionary methods, such as AlphaEvolve, have emerged as powerful approaches for challenging computational optimization problems, such as circle packing. However, prior work typically optimizes performance gain over a fixed number of iterations. We argue that practical optimization should maximize gain per unit cost. To this end, we propose FrugalEvo, a cost-aware evolutionary framework where a stronger, higher-cost LLM explores solution strategies, and a cheaper LLM implements them and iteratively refines the resulting code. We also design a cache-efficient evolution process, where our harness and prompts maximize the sharing of prefixes across different evolution steps, to improve cache reuse. To measure solution quality throughout a fixed cost budget, we introduce Budget-Aware Area Under the Curve (BA-AUC), defined as the area under the best-so-far evaluation score curve over cumulative LLM cost, up to the budget. Across 10 mathematical and systems optimization tasks, FrugalEvo matches or surpasses state-of-the-art baselines, including OpenEvolve, ShinkaEvolve, AdaEvolve, and EvoX, in final solution quality and achieves higher BA-AUC on 9 tasks. It also achieves higher average performance than these baselines on 10 algorithmic optimization tasks from ALE-Bench-Lite. Notably, on circle packing, FrugalEvo achieves new state-of-the-art performance with GPT-5.6 Terra and Luna for only 1.68 USD and with GLM-5.3 and its Flash variant for only 0.55 USD, matching or surpassing all baselines, including multi-agent methods such as CORAL and SwarmResearch, which cost approximately 50 USD on average.