Good Papers

Local Support Learning

Local Support Learning pairs weight adapters with GMM gating to keep updates local, resolving catastrophic forgetting in LLMs up to 7B parameters without prior data.

Assaf Ben-Kish, Akarsh Kumar, James Glass, Raja Giryes

Published Oct 1, 2026▲ 25 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 13arXiv ↗

78%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel11/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 7/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
Local Support Learning frames forgetting as a geometric problem and uses a GMM gate to patch gradient suboptimality, achieving 7B retention without replay, though its circular gate logic, tuning dependence, and missing benchmark curves leave it…

Abstract

We explore catastrophic forgetting in the context of large pre-trained models. By considering forgetting as a geometric problem in the input space of each weight matrix, we uncover a natural retention objective under which updates produced by gradient-based optimizers are suboptimal. Following this observation, we propose Local Support Learning (LSL), a general-purpose framework that augments gradient-based training for retention of prior capabilities without access to prior data. During a new learning phase, LSL pairs two components with distinct roles: a standard weight adapter, trained as usual to minimize the loss, and a gating function that enables the adapter only on input activations from its own training distribution, making the update local to that distribution. The key challenge is that this gate must route data from all learning phases while training only on data from the current one. We address this with a gate based on a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), whose likelihood decays rapidly away from its training data, giving it a natural tendency to stay closed on data from prior phases. We show that this post-training approach can resolve forgetting in LLMs of up to 7 billion parameters, retaining both pretrained and finetuned capabilities across multiple training phases, while being efficient in memory and compute, robust to hyperparameter choice, and showing scaling potential.