Good Papers

LLM2Jev: LLMs Are Already Jev-Style Decision Models -- When and How to Fine-Tune Them

LLM2Jev extracts calibrated Jev-style decisions from LLM token probabilities via training-free inference or tree-factorized fine-tuning, showing strong 4B models already match specialized decision models while fine-tuning mainly helps weaker backbones and specific tasks without degrading generation.

Yinheng Li, Justin Wagle

Published Oct 1, 2026▲ 6 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗

80%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel12/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 6/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
LLM2Jev reveals modern LLMs are potent native Jev-style decision models via bracket-ID extraction, though its Qwen-only validation and uncertain framework novelty beyond tuning leave broader generalization unproven.

Abstract

Jev-style decision models return categorical probability distributions over predefined options without generating free-form text, enabling software systems to act on their outputs directly. In this work, we investigate the extent to which general-purpose LLMs already possess this capability out of the box, and when fine-tuning is actually necessary. We present LLM2Jev, an architecture-preserving framework that extracts calibrated decisions directly from next-token probabilities over bracketed numeric identifiers. LLM2Jev provides both a training-free inference recipe and a fine-tuning objective that optimizes candidate selection via a tree-factorized listwise loss while anchoring auxiliary predictions to the base model using KL divergence penalties. Evaluating on Qwen3.5-4B and Qwen3-0.6B, we find that modern LLMs are inherently effective decision models: without training, the 4B model matches community Jev-style models built on the same backbone, outperforms letter-logit readouts, supports arbitrary option counts, and natively handles multimodal decisions over images. Fine-tuning provides targeted rather than universal benefits -- substantially improving weaker models and specific tasks (such as many-option intent routing), but offering diminishing returns for strong backbones. Crucially, our KL anchors prevent behavioral degradation in conversational text generation, with LoRA delivering the strongest performance on capable models.