Good Papers

ROWBench: Do Video Models Render What the Program Specifies?

PROWBench evaluates video models' fidelity to program-specified world events via replayable world records and VLM-based logic-render and interaction metrics.

Zheng-Hui Huang, Guixu Lin, Yu-Ju Tsai, Jian-Kai Zhu, Fengbo Lan, Yu-Lun Liu, Yung‐Yu Chuang, Kaipeng Zhang, Zhixiang Wang

Published Oct 1, 2026▲ 70 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 31arXiv ↗

76%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel10/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 5/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
ROWBench offers an essential replayable-logic benchmark via engine logs and multi-view sync, but its toy-scale 170-episode suite, uncalibrated VLM metrics, and missing baseline scores leave program-render fidelity unproven until long-horizon consistency is verified.

Abstract

Programmable world models separate executable dynamics from visual generation, offering a promising foundation for next-generation game engines. However, their visual adherence to explicit rules and interactions remains insufficiently evaluated. Existing benchmarks assess visual quality, controllability, and instruction or physical adherence, but rarely test fidelity to fine-grained, program-specified world events. We introduce PROWBench, comprising 170 programmatically constructed episodes and 600 proxy videos covering diverse scenes and interactions. PROWBench logs entity states and timestamped events, including those outside the camera's field of view, as replayable world records, from which it renders synchronized views and proxy representations. This enables generated videos to be checked against the observable consequences of program execution. An extensible framework constructs scenes, controls behaviors, and can render each camera view in different representations, such as coarse 3D, and bounding boxes. The benchmark covers first- and third-person perspectives, with synchronized multi-view observations available for a subset of episodes. Grounded in these records, PROWBench evaluates entity control, long-horizon memory, and, with two VLM-based metrics, Logic-Render Alignment and Interaction Success Rate, adherence to the prescribed timeline and the visual realization of timestamped engine-recorded events.