Good Papers

GUI-HARVEST: Self-Improving GUI Agents through Evidence-Driven Harness Evolution

GUI-HARVEST optimizes executable harnesses for frozen GUI agents by aligning visual effects, comparing task runs, and consolidating failure patterns into reusable source edits, improving OSWorld-Verified by up to 12.33 points.

Geyi Yang, Zikun Qu, Xiang Li, Zhiyong Wang, Min Zhang, Shipei Zeng, Zhongxiang Dai

Published Oct 1, 2026▲ 5 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 2arXiv ↗

88%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel15/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 9/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
GUI-HARVEST delivers striking frozen-model gains across six backbones and credible cross-benchmark transfer by treating harness optimization as the core product, though skeptics rightly note that without isolating harness edits from execution variance or proving failure patterns…

Abstract

The executable harness surrounding a GUI model determines how observations are assembled, actions are executed, and verification, recovery, and termination are controlled. Compared with harness optimization for non-GUI agents, automatically optimizing this harness poses three coupled challenges: reconciling model intent with observed visual effects, diagnosing failures under variable execution outcomes, and identifying recurrent failure patterns across tasks and translating them into reusable runtime changes. We introduce GUI-HARVEST, an automatic harness optimizer that enables self-improving GUI agents with frozen backbone models. First, to ground diagnosis in observed action effects, it aligns model outputs and executed actions with before-and-after screenshots, tying findings to specific interface transitions. Second, to account for execution variability, it treats repeated runs of the same task as a joint evidence unit, using within-task comparisons to locate outcome-relevant behavioral differences. Third, it consolidates verified findings across tasks into recurring failure patterns, maps them to bounded source-code edits with predictions recorded before evaluation, and checks the predicted behavioral effects alongside task performance through repeated execution. Experiments on OSWorld-Verified show consistent held-out gains across six general-purpose open, GUI-specialized open, and proprietary backbone models; Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct gains 12.33 points on the full suite. Frozen-harness transfer improves GPT-5 by 13.87 percentage points on WindowsAgentArena at 50 steps without further optimization. With the same backbone and initial harness, GUI-HARVEST outperforms Self-Harness and Meta-Harness, suggesting that GUI-specific diagnosis and validation help harness improvements generalize to unseen tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/GaryYang12345/GUI-HARVEST.