Good Papers

RRSI: Regularized Recursive Self-Improvement of Agent Harnesses

RRSI regularizes recursive agent harness self-improvement via annealed edit budgets, trajectory exploration, and critical selection to boost out-of-distribution performance and reduce token use. It improves up to 14.1 points in-distribution and 4.7 points out-of-distribution while cutting policy tok

Peng Xia, Rujun Han, Zifeng Wang, Yanfei Chen, Yufan Zhang, Yoonho Lee, Chengsong Huang, Han Yu, Zhongying CuiZhu, Yifei Ming, Huaxiu Yao, Burak Göktürk, Tomas Pfister, Chen-Yu Lee

Published Sep 21, 2026▲ 222 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 1,293arXiv ↗

89%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel16/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 9/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
RRSI delivers a disciplined harness-evolution framework that yields real out-of-distribution gains and a leaner token budget via its critic and pruner, though its modest 4.7-point spread and unexamined per-benchmark variance leave the containment claim thinner than…

Abstract

An LLM agent's capability is largely magnified by its harness, namely the prompts, control flow, tooling, memory, and context management surrounding the frozen backbone model. Recent methods increasingly automate this process by iteratively proposing and selecting component-wise edits of an agent harness, practically establishing a form of recursive self-improvement (RSI) at the agent-system level. However, such recursive evolution may overfit by memorizing the training tasks, showing large in-distribution gains that shrink or even vanish on out-of-distribution benchmarks. We introduce Regularized Recursive Self-Improvement of Agent Harnesses (RRSI), which incorporates the principles of regularizations into harness self-improvement by constraining the evolution candidate proposal and selection. The proposer operates with a temporally annealed budget, limiting how many edits a candidate can bundle, and it encourages unexplored trajectories based on evolution history. The selector is equipped with a critic and a pruner: the critic screens benchmark-specific proposals, while the pruner, removes changes that are too small, too expensive, or no longer useful. Together these constraints favor reusable agent mechanisms over benchmark-specific ones or even noises. Across eight benchmarks spanning coding, agentic workspace and engineering design tasks, RRSI gains up to 14.1 points on the split it evolves against and up to 4.7 points on the five out-of-distribution benchmarks, while producing a harness that runs on 30% fewer policy tokens than the unregularized evolution. Code is available at https://github.com/google-research/rrsi and project page is https://regularized-rsi.com/.