Good Papers

Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs

LocQA reveals multilingual LLMs implicitly favor US answers globally and larger populations intra-linguistically, with instruction tuning amplifying global bias.

Association for Computational Linguistics 2026, Sivan Eiger, Matan Eyal, goldman, omer, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Adi Mayrav Gilady, Guy Mor-Lan, Idan Szpektor, Reut Tsarfaty

Published Jun 3, 2026Paper ↗

85%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel14/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 7/10
strict 2/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have minimized the fluency gap between languages. This advancement, however, exposes models to the risk of biased behavior, as knowledge and norms may propagate across languages. In this work we aim to quantify models' inter- and intra-lingual biases, via their ability to answer locale-ambiguous questions. To this end, we present LocQA, a test set containing 2,156 questions in 12 languages, referring to various locale-dependent facts such as laws, dates, and measurements. The questions do not contain indications of the locales they relate to, other than the querying language itself. LLMs' responses to LocQA locale-ambiguous questions thus reveal models' implicit priors. We used LocQA to evaluate 32 models, and detected two types of structural biases. Inter-lingually, we show a global bias towards answers relevant to the US-locale, even when models are asked in languages other than English. Moreover, we discovered that this global bias is exacerbated in models that underwent instruction tuning, compared to their base counterparts. Intra-lingually, we show that when multiple locales are relevant for the same language, models act as demographic probability engines, prioritizing locales with larger populations. Taken together, insights from LocQA may help in shaping LLMs' desired local behavior, and in quantifying the impact of various training phases on different kinds of biases.