Good Papers

RewardHarness: Self-Evolving Agentic Post-Training

RewardHarness evolves agentic evaluation tools from minimal preference data to judge image edits, surpassing GPT-5 accuracy with 0.05% training annotations.

Yuxuan Zhang, Penghui Du, Bo Li, Cong Wei, Miao, Junwen, Huaisong Zhang, Songcheng Cai, Yubo Wang, Dongfu Jiang, Yuyu Zhang, Ping Nie, Wenhu Chen, Changqian Yu, Kelsey R. Allen

Published May 9, 2026▲ 244 on Hugging FaceCode ★ 69arXiv ↗

83%
OverallMust read
?
OverallMust readVote to see the scoreThe exact score shows once you've voted, so every vote is your own call. The first half of each home page shelf shows its scores.
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel13/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 7/10
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said
Panel consensus
RewardHarness earns praise for proving context-evolving agentic rewards can surpass weight-trained models using 0.05% of preference data, though reviewers reserve judgment over whether its growing tool library can scale past 47.4% accuracy without weight updates, and…

Abstract

Evaluating instruction-guided image edits requires rewards that reflect subtle human preferences, yet current reward models typically depend on large-scale preference annotation and additional model training. This creates a data-efficiency gap: humans can often infer the target evaluation criteria from only a few examples, while models are usually trained on hundreds of thousands of comparisons. We present RewardHarness, a self-evolving agentic reward framework that reframes reward modeling as context evolution rather than weight optimization. Instead of learning from large-scale annotations, RewardHarness aligns with human preferences by iteratively evolving a library of tools and skills from as few as 100 preference demonstrations. Given a source image, candidate edited images, and an editing instruction, an Orchestrator selects the most relevant subset of tools and skills from the maintained library, and a frozen Sub-Agent uses them to construct a reasoning chain that produces a preference judgment. By comparing predicted judgments with ground-truth preferences and analyzing successes and failures in the reasoning process, the Orchestrator automatically refines its library of tools and skills without additional human annotation. Using only 0.05% of the EditReward preference data, RewardHarness achieves 47.4% average accuracy on image-editing evaluation benchmarks, surpassing GPT-5 by 5.3 points. When used as a reward signal for GRPO fine-tuning, RL-tuned models achieve 3.52 on ImgEdit-Bench. Project page: https://rewardharness.com.