Good Papers

CovAgent: Overcoming the 30% Curse of Mobile Application Coverage with Agentic AI and Dynamic Instrumentation

CovAgent uses agentic AI and dynamic instrumentation to satisfy activation conditions and substantially improve Android app UI testing coverage beyond existing fuzzers.

Wei Minn, Biniam Fisseha Demissie, Yan Naing Tun, Jiakun Liu, Mariano Ceccato, Lwin Khin Shar, David Lo

Published Jan 29, 2026▲ 1 on Hugging FacearXiv ↗

77%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel11/20reviewers recommend it
lenient 4/5
medium 7/10
strict 0/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

Automated GUI testing is crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of Android apps. However, the efficacy of existing UI testing techniques is often limited, especially in terms of coverage. Recent studies, including the state-of-the-art, struggle to achieve more than 30% activity coverage in real-world apps. This limited coverage can be attributed to a combination of factors such as failing to generate complex user inputs, unsatisfied activation conditions regarding device configurations and external resources, and hard-to-reach code paths that are not easily accessible through the GUI. To overcome these limitations, we propose CovAgent, a novel agentic AI-powered approach to enhance Android app UI testing. Our fuzzer-agnostic framework comprises an AI agent that inspects the app's decompiled Smali code and component transition graph, and reasons about unsatisfied activation conditions within the app code logic that prevent access to the activities that are unreachable by standard and widely adopted GUI fuzzers. Then, another agent generates dynamic instrumentation scripts that satisfy activation conditions required for successful transitions to those activities. We found that augmenting existing fuzzing approaches with our framework achieves a significant improvement in test coverage over the state-of-the-art, LLMDroid, and other baselines such as Fastbot and APE (e.g., 101.1%, 116.3% and 179.7% higher activity coverage, respectively). CovAgent also outperforms all the baselines in other metrics such as class, method, and line coverage. We also conduct investigations into components within CovAgent to reveal further insights regarding the efficacy of Agentic AI in the field of automated app testing such as the agentic activation condition inference accuracy, and agentic activity-launching success rate.