VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluation
VIEScore is a training-free, explainable metric using multimodal LLMs to evaluate conditional image synthesis, achieving near-human correlation on generation but weaker performance on editing.
Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.
Abstract
In the rapidly advancing field of conditional image generation research, challenges such as limited explainability lie in effectively evaluating the performance and capabilities of various models.This paper introduces VIESCORE, a Visual Instruction-guided Explainable metric for evaluating any conditional image generation tasks.VIESCORE leverages general knowledge from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) as the backbone and does not require training or fine-tuning.We evaluate VIESCORE on seven prominent tasks in conditional image tasks and found: (1) VIESCORE (GPT4-o) achieves a high Spearman correlation of 0.4 with human evaluations, while the human-to-human correlation is 0.45.(2) VI-ESCORE (with open-source MLLM) is significantly weaker than GPT-4o and GPT-4v in evaluating synthetic images.(3) VIESCORE achieves a correlation on par with human ratings in the generation tasks but struggles in editing tasks.With these results, we believe VIESCORE shows its great potential to replace human judges in evaluating image synthesis tasks.