Good Papers

Skin cancer detection by deep learning and sound analysis algorithms: A prospective clinical study of an elementary dermoscope

Deep learning with sonification of elementary dermoscope images achieves 91.7% sensitivity and comparable accuracy to advanced devices, indicating image quality is not the primary factor in AI skin cancer diagnosis.

Avi Dascalu, Eli Omid David

Published May 1, 2019126 citationsPaper ↗

69%
OverallHighly rated
?
OverallHighly ratedVote to see the score
Readers
–

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in to vote.

AI panel6/21reviewers recommend it
lenient 3/5
medium 2/11
strict 1/5
AI panel?Vote to see what the 20 AI reviewers said

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer (SC), especially melanoma, is a growing public health burden. Experimental studies have indicated a potential diagnostic role for deep learning (DL) algorithms in identifying SC at varying sensitivities. Previously, it was demonstrated that diagnostics by dermoscopy are improved by applying an additional sonification (data to sound waves conversion) layer on DL algorithms. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of image quality on accuracy of diagnosis by sonification employing a rudimentary skin magnifier with polarized light (SMP). METHODS: Dermoscopy images acquired by SMP were processed by a first deep learning algorithm and sonified. Audio output was further analyzed by a different secondary DL. Study criteria outcomes of SMP were specificity and sensitivity, which were further processed by a F2-score, i.e. applying a twice extra weight to sensitivity over positive predictive values. FINDINGS: Patients (n = 73) fulfilling inclusion criteria were referred to biopsy. SMP analysis metrics resulted in a receiver operator characteristic curve AUC's of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.798-0.831). SMP achieved a F2-score sensitivity of 91.7%, specificity of 41.8% and positive predictive value of 57.3%. Diagnosing the same set of patients' lesions by an advanced dermoscope resulted in a F2-score sensitivity of 89.5%, specificity of 57.8% and a positive predictive value of 59.9% (P=NS). INTERPRETATION: DL processing of dermoscopic images followed by sonification results in an accurate diagnostic output for SMP, implying that the quality of the dermoscope is not the major factor influencing DL diagnosis of skin cancer. Present system might assist all healthcare providers as a feasible computer-assisted detection system. FUND: Bostel Technologies. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362138.