Good Papers

Showing papers from University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Show all papers

45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score
NeurIPS 2026UNSW SydneyU Technology SydneyShanghai Jiao Tongthe university of new south waleShanghai JiaotongLink prediction

A New Perspective on Target-Conditioned Structural Dynamics for Link Prediction in Dynamic Graphs

YUANYUAN XU, Yin Chen, Yingxuan Li, Wenjie Zhang and 2 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score
NeurIPS 2026U Technology SydneyAmazonU Technology SydneyThe Education University of HongRecommender systems

ALIGN-Rec: Continual Recommendation under Heterogeneous Unlearning Requests

Nitin Bisht, Sumit Bisht, Tong Zhang, Yu Yang and 2 more

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
91%Must read
?Must readVote to see the score
NeurIPS 2026TongjiU Technology SydneyLLM evaluation & benchmarks

GraphInstruct: A Progressive Benchmark for Diagnosing Capability Gaps in LLM Graph Generation

GraphInstruct introduces progressive-complexity benchmark diagnosing LLM graph generation failures across six complexity levels, finding multi-constraint composition limits capability and domain-semantic constraints require retrieval.

Zihe Wei, Sheng Xiang, Ying Zhang, changjun jiang

Sydney Poster Session 1, Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
18/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 18 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 5/5
medium 9/10
strict 4/5