67%Highly rated?Highly ratedVote to see the scoreNeurIPS 2026City University of Hong KongNanyang TechnologicalU Hong KongHarbin Institute of TechnologyCity University of Hong KongVision-language modelsMedVIGOR: Visual Evidence Internalization for Observation-Driven Reasoning in Medical VLMsYuan Wu, Jiayu Qian, Sipeng Wu, Songpan Gao and 5 moreSydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026– ReadersNo votes yet2/20 AI panelreviewers recommend itReaders and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.Worth readingNot for meOnly vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.AI panel: 2 of 20 reviewers recommend itlenient 2/5medium 0/10strict 0/5
67%Highly rated?Highly ratedVote to see the scoreNeurIPS 2026Nanyang TechnologicalInstitute of Computing TechnologBeihangU the Chinese Academy of ScienceFudanAdversarial robustnessOmni-Safety under Cross-Modality Conflict: Vulnerabilities, Dynamic Mechanisms and Efficient AlignmentKun Wang, Zherui Li, Zhenhong Zhou, Jie Zhang and 7 moreSydney Poster Session 2, Tue, Dec 8, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026– ReadersNo votes yet2/20 AI panelreviewers recommend itReaders and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.Worth readingNot for meOnly vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.AI panel: 2 of 20 reviewers recommend itlenient 1/5medium 1/10strict 0/5
89%Must read?Must readVote to see the scoreNeurIPS 2026SpotlightAnhui PolytechnicSUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITYNanyang TechnologicalNanyang Technology University, SVision-language modelsText as Partial Constraint: Core–Residual Alignment for Robust Vision–Language LearningTPC treats captions as partial constraints, aligning vision-language representations to a consensus semantic core while penalizing dependence on unsaid residuals, yielding robust zero-shot recognition and improved LVLM grounding.Chengzhen Yu, Canran Xiao, SiYuan Ma, Yang LiuSydney Poster Session 1, Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026– ReadersNo votes yet16/20 AI panelreviewers recommend itReaders and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.Worth readingNot for meOnly vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.AI panel: 16 of 20 reviewers recommend itlenient 5/5medium 9/10strict 2/5