Good Papers

Showing papers from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Show all papers

45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Forgetting to Improve: Principled Data Removal in Active Learning

Manuel Wendl, Erik Englesson, Andreas Krause, Carl Henrik Ek

Sydney Poster Session 1, Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Exact power indices for plurality-voting ensembles

Ilie Sarpe, Theofanis Georgakopoulos, Aristides Gionis

Sydney Poster Session 2, Tue, Dec 8, 5:00 PM–8:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
45%Niche pick
?Niche pickVote to see the score

Differentiable Systematic Resampling for Variational Sequential Monte Carlo

Fredrik Cumlin, Saikat Chatterjee

Atlanta Poster Session 3, Thu, Dec 10, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall C1 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
0/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 0 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 0/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

Robust Flow Matching under Target Corruption and Label Noise

Mert Can Kurucu, Erik Englesson, Hossein Azizpour

Paris Poster Session 4, Thu, Dec 10, 5:30 PM–7:30 PM, Paris Poster Hall · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
57%Worth a look
?Worth a lookVote to see the score

The Adversarial Gait: Detecting Visual Adversarial Attacks against Vision-Language Models via Self-Targeted Gradient Characterization

Mauricio Byrd Victorica, Ezzeldin Shereen, György Dán

Sydney Poster Session 3, Wed, Dec 9, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
1/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 1 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 1/5
medium 0/10
strict 0/5
71%Highly rated
?Highly ratedVote to see the score

Density-Ratio Losses for Post-Hoc Learning to Defer

Post-hoc learning to defer is cast as density-ratio estimation between ideal distributions, yielding adjustable deferral rules that recover Chow's rule and outperform baselines.

Alexander Soen, Ragnar Thobaben, Joakim Jaldén, Richard Nock

Sydney Poster Session 1, Tue, Dec 8, 10:00 AM–1:00 PM, Hall 1-4 · Published 2026

– ReadersNo votes yet
6/20 AI panelreviewers recommend it

Readers and the AI panel: vote on this paper to see what they said.

Only vote on papers you've read. Sign in with GitHub to vote.

AI panel: 6 of 20 reviewers recommend it
lenient 2/5
medium 4/10
strict 0/5